friendsdontletfriendsdie.com
May 18, 2012, 09:10:05 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:   www.friendsdontletfriendsdie.com
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Drug overdose callers may get legal immunity (failed3/14)~ Washington  (Read 1309 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Kathy
Administrator
Sr. Member
*****

Karma: 1
Offline Offline

Posts: 432



View Profile WWW
« on: February 21, 2009, 11:19:56 AM »

- These Bills Failed to Pass Read below posted in in the LAST Reply -


Drug overdose callers may get legal immunity

06:57 PM PST on Friday, February 20, 2009

By DEBORAH FELDMAN / KING 5 News

Video: New bill gives legal immunity to drug overdose witnesses
Larger screen E-mail this clip

SEATTLE – A pair of bills have passed in the Washington Legislature that would provide legal immunity for people who call medics when they see someone overdosing on drugs.

Supporters say it will save lives while critics say it gives safe haven to criminals.

Brenda Harrison has been clean and sober for 19 years. She’s now a counselor at Therapeutic Health Services. Her clients use drugs ranging from heroin to prescription oxycontin.

She says almost any addict would hesitate to get help for a friend who’s overdosed if it means facing criminal prosecution themselves.
Related Content

Read the Senate bill

Testimony of Justin and Jason Munning in support of HB 1796 (.pdf)

Why providing limited immunity from drug-related charges in overdose situations will save lives (.pdf)

Save a life: Prevent overdose deaths (.pdf)

Saving lives, saving money: City-coordinated drug overdose prevention (.pdf)

8/26/08: Judge gives exceptional sentence in Ecstasy death

More political news

"Even fairly kind people who have a good heart and some pretty good values, they will pause if it means maybe giving up their freedom for five, ten years,” said Harrison.

In 2007, more than 760 people died in Washington state from overdoses. That includes 16-year-old Danielle McCarthy from Puyallup, who died after taking Ecstacy. The other teens she was with claimed they were too scared to get her help until it was too late.

Stories like McCarthy’s have prompted lawmakers to push for the passage of a bill to give legal immunity to anyone who calls 911 when witnessing a drug overdose.

"If we can save a life, then that is what I'm concerned with,” said Sen. Rosa Franklin, D, Lakewood.

The bill made it through the judiciary committee, but Sen. Pam Roach, R-Auburn, voted against it, saying it provides a safe haven to criminals.

"Well I think we should do everything we can to save a life, that's absolutely right, but we can't do it in a way that creates holes in our very well structured drug law,” said Roach.

Harrison disagrees, saying police and prosecutors can always pursue a criminal, but that a lost life can never be replaced.

KING

Danielle McCarthy of Puyallup, Wash. died after taking Ecstasy.

"If they're still breathing, there's hope,” said Harrison. “Once they're not breathing anymore, that's done. And so all the dreams of that family – gone.”

A companion bill has also passed through a House sub-committee. The Senate has considered similar bills in the past, but not approved them.

Bernie Ryan, Sr. Staff Counsel for the Senate Democratic Caucus, would like to correct a portion of your story that aired about drug overdose legislation pending in the Legislature. You mentioned that the bill gives legal immunity to anyone who calls in a drug overdose. Bernie says that is not the case.

Editor's note: Senate Bill 5516 exempts a person from only one thing-a charge of drug possession. It does not immunize a person from a charge of drug sales, drug manufacturing or any unrelated charge (such as possessing stolen property). So, if an officer comes in responding to a 911 call about an overdose and sees a gun or a stolen car or wads of cash from drug transactions, that person does not have immunity. It is only from drug possession charges that immunity can be found.
« Last Edit: March 23, 2009, 10:18:31 AM by Kathy » Logged
Kathy
Administrator
Sr. Member
*****

Karma: 1
Offline Offline

Posts: 432



View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: March 02, 2009, 06:50:30 AM »

Lawmaker wants people to call 911 for drug ODs
MELISSA SANTOS; melissa.santos@thenewstribune.com

Danielle McCarthy might have survived an Ecstasy overdose two years ago, if only her friends had called 911 for help.

The 16-year-old Puyallup girl died on New Year’s Day 2007 after attending parties in Edmonds and Seattle. She showed signs of overdosing for nearly eight hours, but no one with her called for medical aid.

A bill under consideration in the state Legislature aims to get people to report overdoses before they turn fatal.
A Tacoma legislator hopes to eliminate drug possession charges for those who seek medical aid for someone who overdoses. But the father of a dead Puyallup teen says the bill would do more harm than good.

And Danielle’s father, Pat McCarthy, opposes it.

Senate Bill 5516 would forgo charging people with drug possession if they were caught because they sought help for an overdose. The bill passed out of committee Feb. 19 and soon could be scheduled for a floor vote.

Bill sponsor Sen. Rosa Franklin, D-Tacoma, said she doesn’t want fear of drug possession charges to stop people from calling 911 when someone overdoses.

“My interest in this bill is actually about saving lives,” Franklin said last week.

A bill similar to Franklin’s, Substitute House Bill 1796, is also moving through the Capitol.

‘TICKET TO FREEDOM’


Pat McCarthy said the bills would create a loophole for people to get away with drug offenses.

“As long as you call 911, it’s your ticket to freedom,” McCarthy said. “Even if they call after someone’s already dead, it seems to give immunity.”

The bills wouldn’t protect people who distribute drugs or are accused of controlled substance homicide, the legal term for providing drugs that lead to a fatal overdose.

That was the charge brought against the two people who provided Ecstasy to Danielle McCarthy. One, David Morris, pleaded guilty to the charge and was sentenced to nearly five years in prison. The other, Donalydia Huertas, a former classmate of Danielle’s at Rogers High School, was convicted of second-degree manslaughter and received two years of juvenile detention.

At least three other people were with Danielle while she was dying, court records say, and none made the phone call that could have saved her life.

According to court records, Danielle vomited repeatedly and drifted in and out of consciousness for several hours. When her companions couldn’t awaken her around 6:30 a.m. on New Year’s Day, they placed her in a warm bath for about 15 minutes and researched “Ecstasy overdose” on the Internet, the records state.

DISCOURAGED FROM CALLING 911

Morris called his mother, a registered nurse, and she told him to call 911, the documents say, but the host of the party discouraged him from calling because the host had a warrant out for his arrest.

Morris and Huertas drove Danielle to an Edmonds hospital around 9:45 a.m., but she was already dead.

“They could have called,” Franklin said.

The Tacoma lawmaker, who has served nearly two decades, said Danielle’s case was one of many that prompted her to introduce the legislation.

According to state statistics, 5.6 Washington residents per 100,000 died from drug use in 1992; by 2003 that number had risen to 9.9 deaths per 100,000.

But Pat McCarthy said he doesn’t think eliminating the threat of drug possession charges would have prompted any of Danielle’s friends to call 911.

“People out there, if they’re going to call, they will,” he said. “It’s about compassion. There’s nothing that could ever happen to you from calling that compares to somebody dying.”

Prosecutors share McCarthy’s concerns that Franklin’s bill could complicate criminal trials without changing people’s behavior, said Tom McBride, executive director of the Washington Association of Prosecuting Attorneys.

The bill could create an argument for suppression of evidence in a variety of drug cases, McBride said.

“There’s a grant of immunity from prosecution in this bill,” McBride said at the bill’s hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Feb. 11. “You can’t take that back.”

Also, defendants occasionally are tried for drug delivery, but a jury ends up convicting them on a lesser charge of drug possession, McBride said. The law doesn’t address whether the reduced charge would stand if a 911 call was made before an arrest, he said.

HOLD THEM RESPONSIBLE

Pat McCarthy said he thinks legislators should take the opposite approach of what is contained in Franklin’s bill: They should make it a crime for people to fail to summon aid for someone who is overdosing.

That’s a better strategy than eliminating the threat of a drug charge for people who do decide to call, he said.

“You’ll probably see a reduction in overdose deaths if people know they are going to be held responsible for their actions,” McCarthy said.

He suggested that current failure-to-summon-assistance laws could be used for that purpose, but McBride said it would be hard to apply those statutes to drug overdoses.

Franklin said she sees punishing people who don’t call 911 as a negative way to approach the problem. She said she’s trying to use a carrot rather than a stick.

“I think it would push people away so they don’t call,” Franklin said. “It’s just not going about it the right way.”
Logged
Kathy
Administrator
Sr. Member
*****

Karma: 1
Offline Offline

Posts: 432



View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: March 07, 2009, 09:20:54 AM »


Lawmaker wants people to call 911 for drug ODs




MELISSA SANTOS; melissa.santos@thenewstribune.com
Published: 03/01/09  12:05 am


Danielle McCarthy might have survived an Ecstasy overdose two years ago, if only her friends had called 911 for help.

The 16-year-old Puyallup girl died on New Year’s Day 2007 after attending parties in Edmonds and Seattle. She showed signs of overdosing for nearly eight hours, but no one with her called for medical aid.

A bill under consideration in the state Legislature aims to get people to report overdoses before they turn fatal.

And Danielle’s father, Pat McCarthy, opposes it.

Senate Bill 5516 would forgo charging people with drug possession if they were caught because they sought help for an overdose. The bill passed out of committee Feb. 19 and soon could be scheduled for a floor vote.

Bill sponsor Sen. Rosa Franklin, D-Tacoma, said she doesn’t want fear of drug possession charges to stop people from calling 911 when someone overdoses.

“My interest in this bill is actually about saving lives,” Franklin said last week.

A bill similar to Franklin’s, Substitute House Bill 1796, is also moving through the Capitol.

‘TICKET TO FREEDOM’

Pat McCarthy said the bills would create a loophole for people to get away with drug offenses.

“As long as you call 911, it’s your ticket to freedom,” McCarthy said. “Even if they call after someone’s already dead, it seems to give immunity.”

The bills wouldn’t protect people who distribute drugs or are accused of controlled substance homicide, the legal term for providing drugs that lead to a fatal overdose.

That was the charge brought against the two people who provided Ecstasy to Danielle McCarthy. One, David Morris, pleaded guilty to the charge and was sentenced to nearly five years in prison. The other, Donalydia Huertas, a former classmate of Danielle’s at Rogers High School, was convicted of second-degree manslaughter and received two years of juvenile detention.

At least three other people were with Danielle while she was dying, court records say, and none made the phone call that could have saved her life.

According to court records, Danielle vomited repeatedly and drifted in and out of consciousness for several hours. When her companions couldn’t awaken her around 6:30 a.m. on New Year’s Day, they placed her in a warm bath for about 15 minutes and researched “Ecstasy overdose” on the Internet, the records state.

DISCOURAGED FROM CALLING 911

Morris called his mother, a registered nurse, and she told him to call 911, the documents say, but the host of the party discouraged him from calling because the host had a warrant out for his arrest.

Morris and Huertas drove Danielle to an Edmonds hospital around 9:45 a.m., but she was already dead.

“They could have called,” Franklin said.

The Tacoma lawmaker, who has served nearly two decades, said Danielle’s case was one of many that prompted her to introduce the legislation.

According to state statistics, 5.6 Washington residents per 100,000 died from drug use in 1992; by 2003 that number had risen to 9.9 deaths per 100,000.

But Pat McCarthy said he doesn’t think eliminating the threat of drug possession charges would have prompted any of Danielle’s friends to call 911.

“People out there, if they’re going to call, they will,” he said. “It’s about compassion. There’s nothing that could ever happen to you from calling that compares to somebody dying.”

Prosecutors share McCarthy’s concerns that Franklin’s bill could complicate criminal trials without changing people’s behavior, said Tom McBride, executive director of the Washington Association of Prosecuting Attorneys.

The bill could create an argument for suppression of evidence in a variety of drug cases, McBride said.

“There’s a grant of immunity from prosecution in this bill,” McBride said at the bill’s hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Feb. 11. “You can’t take that back.”

Also, defendants occasionally are tried for drug delivery, but a jury ends up convicting them on a lesser charge of drug possession, McBride said. The law doesn’t address whether the reduced charge would stand if a 911 call was made before an arrest, he said.

HOLD THEM RESPONSIBLE

Pat McCarthy said he thinks legislators should take the opposite approach of what is contained in Franklin’s bill: They should make it a crime for people to fail to summon aid for someone who is overdosing.

That’s a better strategy than eliminating the threat of a drug charge for people who do decide to call, he said.

“You’ll probably see a reduction in overdose deaths if people know they are going to be held responsible for their actions,” McCarthy said.

He suggested that current failure-to-summon-assistance laws could be used for that purpose, but McBride said it would be hard to apply those statutes to drug overdoses.

Franklin said she sees punishing people who don’t call 911 as a negative way to approach the problem. She said she’s trying to use a carrot rather than a stick.

“I think it would push people away so they don’t call,” Franklin said. “It’s just not going about it the right way.”

http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/crime/story/642012.html
Logged
Kathy
Administrator
Sr. Member
*****

Karma: 1
Offline Offline

Posts: 432



View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: March 07, 2009, 09:23:22 AM »


Drug-related immunity bill goes one step too far
Related Content




THE NEWS TRIBUNE
Published: 03/05/09  12:05 am


If people sharing drugs notice that one person has sickened, perhaps passed out, should they get immunity from drug-related prosecution if they call 911 for help?

What about the person who actually provided the drugs? Should he or she also get a pass from prosecution if it saves a life?

Those questions are at the heart of legislation sponsored by state Sen. Rosa Franklin, D-Tacoma. Senate Bill 5516 would provide immunity from prosecution to those seeking help for someone experiencing a drug overdose. That immunity is sharply targeted at drug users, not the really bad players in the drug scene: the manufacturers and dealers. And immunity would not apply if the person dies and the witness is the one who provided the drug.

The legislation addresses a very real problem: Drug overdoses are the second leading cause of accidental death behind motor vehicle accidents. In 2006, 707 people died in this state due to unintentional drug poisoning.

While hard drugs like heroin used to be the main problem, overdoses today are more likely to be caused by prescription drugs. Many deaths might have been prevented had someone called 911, but researchers say fear of arrest or police involvement is the main reason people fail to summon aid.

Some critics oppose Franklin’s bill because they say it would let people off the hook for illegal behavior and reward them for doing something they should do anyway: seek help for a person in distress. And prosecutors are concerned that it could complicate criminal trials.

Those are valid arguments. But more important than putting away a few drug users is this legislation’s potential to save lives – like that of Danielle McCarthy, the 16-year-old Puyallup girl who overdosed on Ecstasy in 2007. At least five people were aware that she was in trouble, but no one called for help.

Franklin’s legislation is worth supporting – to a point. Lawmakers should reject the provision giving immunity to the drug provider if that person calls for help – and as long as the victim doesn’t die and no money had been exchanged. That takes immunity one step farther than it should go.

It’s one thing to give a pass to someone the victim has been partying with. But anyone who provides illegal drugs – especially to minors like Danielle McCarthy – deserves prosecution, not a get-out-of-jail-free card.

http://www.thenewstribune.com/opinion/story/646343.html
Logged
Kathy
Administrator
Sr. Member
*****

Karma: 1
Offline Offline

Posts: 432



View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: March 23, 2009, 10:17:47 AM »

Under the dome — March 14

Mourning

The American Civil Liberties Union of Washington said it was disappointed by the death of two bills aimed at reducing drug overdoes. The measures failed to come to a vote by Thursday's cutoff.
Senate Bill 5516, sponsored by Sen. Rosa Franklin, and House Bill 1796, sponsored by Rep. Roger Goodman, provided immunity from prosecution to people who summon medical help in a drug-overdose situation.
"We're certainly disappointed the bills did not receive full consideration and discussion this session. But we're encouraged by their progress and the increased attention being paid to this public-health crisis," said Shankar Narayan, the ACLU of Washington legislative director.
The legal immunity offered was restricted to charges for possessing or sharing drugs, the organization noted. The bills did not provide protection from charges for controlled-substances homicide, manufacturing drugs, drug dealing or any non-drug-related crime.

Compiled By Adam Wilson And Brad Shannon

Taken From The Olympian @  http://www.theolympian.com/legislature/story/787099.html
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.13 | SMF © 2006-2011, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.184 seconds with 21 queries.